If your company is evaluating compliance automation tools, Sprinto and Secureframe are likely at the top of your list. Both help organizations achieve certifications like SOC 2 and ISO 27001, but they differ in depth, automation, and scalability.
Secureframe is ideal for startups that need to get one or two certifications quickly and prefer simplicity.
Sprinto is built for scaling companies that need deeper automation, multi-framework coverage, and continuous monitoring.
Secureframe is known for its user-friendly interface and responsive support.
Sprinto focuses on speed, scalability, and comprehensive automation.
Secureframe helps organizations meet compliance standards such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR. Its main strength is a simple, guided setup that accelerates first-time compliance. The platform includes pre-built templates, automated evidence collection, continuous monitoring, and strong customer support.
Users often praise Secureframe's intuitive design and fast onboarding, though some report limited flexibility when scaling to more complex requirements.
Sprinto offers a robust solution for companies looking to automate their compliance processes. It provides extensive integrations, real-time monitoring, and a focus on multi-framework compliance, making it suitable for organizations with diverse needs.
Sprinto automates compliance for companies that move fast and operate in complex cloud environments. It connects directly to over 200 systems to collect evidence, enforce controls, and maintain audit readiness across multiple frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Sprinto's differentiator is its combination of deep automation, scalable workflows, and expert-led support. It suits teams that want compliance to run in the background while focusing on growth.
| Feature | Sprinto | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Admin | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| Ease of Use | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Compliance Monitoring | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Anomaly Detection | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Data Loss Prevention | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Audit Trail | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Integrations | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Quality of Support | 9.4 | 9.5 |
Sprinto is designed for high automation. It automatically gathers evidence, monitors controls, and updates compliance dashboards in real time. Secureframe automates core workflows but relies on more manual uploads as systems grow more complex.
Verdict: Sprinto delivers broader automation and scales better for companies managing multiple frameworks.
Both platforms cover major standards. Secureframe supports over 35 frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. Sprinto supports more than 30, with shared control mapping that allows teams to reuse evidence across frameworks.
Verdict: Equal coverage, but Sprinto offers better flexibility for multi-framework programs.
Sprinto integrates with more than 200 tools such as AWS, GCP, Azure, Okta, and Jira. Secureframe provides a similarly wide range of integrations but focuses more on ease of setup.
Verdict: Tie. Sprinto goes deeper in automation, Secureframe wins in simplicity.
Secureframe's interface is clean and easy to navigate, making it a strong choice for first-time users. Sprinto earns higher marks for ease of administration thanks to clear ownership tracking and role-based workflows.
Verdict: Secureframe is better for beginners. Sprinto is better for ongoing program management.
Sprinto includes asynchronous auditor access, time-stamped audit trails, and a centralized audit hub. Secureframe also provides automated evidence collection but may require manual reconciliation for complex control dependencies.
Verdict: Sprinto offers better audit transparency and collaboration tools.
Both products receive excellent reviews for customer support. Secureframe scores 9.5 for Quality of Support, with users praising responsiveness and helpfulness. Sprinto scores 9.4, with 24/7 expert access and strong compliance guidance.
Verdict: Secureframe leads slightly in responsiveness. Sprinto provides deeper technical expertise.
Both use quote-based pricing. Sprinto's all-inclusive model covers automation, implementation, and audit preparation without add-ons. Secureframe's pricing depends on frameworks and modules, which can increase with scope.
Verdict: Sprinto is more predictable for scaling teams. Secureframe is flexible for smaller companies.
| Category | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Secureframe |
| Automation | Sprinto |
| Scalability | Sprinto |
| Customer Support | Secureframe |
| Audit Readiness | Sprinto |
| Pricing Transparency | Sprinto |
| Setup Simplicity | Secureframe |
Both Sprinto and Secureframe simplify compliance and make audit readiness more efficient.
You want a quick, guided path to one or two certifications with minimal setup and excellent support.
Your company needs scalability, deep automation, and a system that grows with you across multiple frameworks.
Each tool has its strengths. The right choice depends on your team's size, complexity, and long-term compliance goals.
While both Sprinto and Secureframe are solid choices, Smartly offers a unique combination of speed, affordability, and expert guidance specifically designed for startups and SMEs seeking ISO 27001 certification.
Average time to certification vs traditional GRC platforms
Total cost of ownership including software, consulting, and audit
All our clients pass their ISO 27001 audit on the first attempt
Trusted by startups across Southeast Asia and beyond