Vanta vs Secureframe: Which Compliance Platform is Better for Your Business | 2025 Comparison

    Vanta vs Secureframe: Which Compliance Platform is Better for Your Business

    In today's fast-moving security landscape, choosing the right compliance platform can determine how quickly and confidently your business achieves certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA. Both Vanta and Secureframe automate evidence collection and streamline audits, but their approaches, pricing, and scalability differ significantly.

    Quick Snapshot: Vanta vs Secureframe

    Vanta
    Automated compliance monitoring with 200+ integrations
    Secureframe
    Streamlined compliance with white-glove support
    Best For
    Depends on your team's size and technical expertise

    TLDR Summary

    Vanta is built for simplicity and strong integrations, making it a popular choice for startups that need compliance fast.

    Secureframe focuses on prebuilt frameworks, guided onboarding, and white-glove support, but can feel rigid as businesses scale.

    Both platforms save time, but your ideal choice depends on whether you prioritize breadth of integrations or ease of compliance setup.

    Platform Philosophy and Focus

    Vanta

    Vanta aims to make compliance approachable for fast-growing SaaS teams. Its continuous monitoring system automates control checks and alerts users of failures, helping them maintain audit readiness year-round. Vanta's focus is simplicity — it offers a wide integration ecosystem and straightforward dashboards ideal for smaller teams new to compliance.

    Secureframe

    Secureframe takes a more guided route, emphasizing readiness through prebuilt frameworks and strong support. Its platform includes automated policy templates, control mapping, and evidence storage to help organizations pass audits quickly, even without in-house compliance expertise. Secureframe appeals to teams seeking a structured, consultant-like experience.

    Supported Frameworks

    FrameworkVantaSecureframe
    SOC 2
    ISO 27001 / ISO 27701
    HIPAA
    PCI DSS
    GDPR / CCPA
    NIST FrameworksPartial✔ (800-53, CSF, CMMC)
    Custom FrameworksLimitedHigher tiers
    Total Frameworks~2735+

    Takeaway: Both support the most common compliance standards, but Secureframe offers slightly broader framework coverage, while Vanta's advantage lies in automation depth and integrations.

    Automation and Audit Readiness

    Vanta

    Vanta automates continuous compliance monitoring by connecting directly with cloud, HR, and security tools. Its Audit Center consolidates artifacts and alerts, reducing prep time for SOC 2 and ISO audits. While automation is robust, customization can be limited, and users sometimes note that insights stop at a "pass/fail" level rather than explaining why a control failed.

    Secureframe

    Secureframe focuses on automation through templated workflows. Its evidence repository automatically collects and organizes audit materials, helping teams achieve certification faster. However, as evidence volume grows, users report slower responsiveness and limited flexibility in managing complex frameworks or multi-entity setups.

    Verdict: Vanta delivers more adaptive automation and faster feedback loops, while Secureframe offers stronger guardrails for teams that prefer structure and guided steps.

    Continuous Control Monitoring

    Vanta

    Vanta's continuous monitoring covers access controls, vulnerability scans, and data security posture across multiple frameworks. It excels at alerting users to compliance drift through integrations with cloud and SaaS tools. Some users highlight limitations when working with niche systems or complex multi-cloud configurations.

    Secureframe

    Secureframe offers prebuilt controls and automated monitoring with a centralized dashboard. Its automation works well for standard frameworks but can become less efficient as integrations scale, since not all connectors are deeply synchronized.

    Verdict: Both platforms support real-time monitoring. Vanta's integration-first design makes it stronger for growing, tech-heavy companies with diverse systems.

    Risk Management

    Vanta

    Vanta provides a built-in risk register and scoring system that helps security teams identify potential vulnerabilities. The risk features are helpful for early programs but lack deeper customization or cross-framework mapping, which can be important for larger organizations.

    Secureframe

    Secureframe's risk engine uses AI-driven scoring and visualization tools to assess vendor and internal risks. It automatically generates risk treatment plans and dashboards, but flexibility for advanced scenarios or complex assessments is limited.

    Verdict: Secureframe's risk module provides a visual and simple entry point, while Vanta's approach is better suited for iterative improvement and real-time updates tied to integrations.

    Integration Capabilities

    CapabilityVantaSecureframe
    Integration Count200+~100
    DepthDeep integrations across HR, code, and cloudBasic connectors for most tools
    APISupported for advanced teamsLimited custom API support
    Third-party ToolsExpanding catalogPredefined, less flexible modules

    Verdict: Vanta integrates more deeply with cloud infrastructure, HR systems, and code repositories, giving technical teams end-to-end visibility. Secureframe's integration layer is simpler but works well for standard SaaS setups.

    Customer Support and Onboarding

    Vanta

    Vanta's guided onboarding is straightforward and includes a resource library to help users self-serve. However, support hours are limited by region, and live assistance is not always available for urgent audit prep questions.

    Secureframe

    Secureframe is known for its responsive, white-glove onboarding and dedicated account managers. Support aligns with customer time zones, though some users report occasional lag during high-demand periods.

    Verdict: Secureframe wins on personal support. Vanta offers a more self-directed experience for teams that prefer autonomy and lower costs.

    Pricing and Value

    Vanta

    ~$8,000

    Per framework pricing

    Per-framework pricing

    Good for startups and mid-sized SaaS

    Secureframe

    Tiered

    By business size and framework

    Tiered pricing model

    Best for teams needing guidance

    Verdict: Vanta's per-framework pricing can become costly as organizations expand compliance scope. Secureframe's bundled approach offers predictability but less flexibility in scaling or customization.

    Feature Summary: Vanta vs Secureframe

    FeatureVantaSecureframe
    FocusAutomated compliance monitoringPrebuilt frameworks
    Best ForFast-growing SaaS startupsTeams seeking guidance
    Framework Coverage~27 frameworks35+ frameworks
    Automation DepthHighModerate
    Ease of UseVery highHigh
    Continuous MonitoringStrongModerate
    Risk ManagementBasicVisual but rigid
    Audit ReadinessAutomatedGuided
    Integrations200+~100
    SupportSelf-serve with resourcesWhite-glove onboarding
    Pricing ModelPer-frameworkTiered plans

    Which Platform Fits Your Business?

    Choose Vanta if:

    You need fast, automated compliance monitoring

    Your team is comfortable managing integrations directly

    You're scaling quickly through your first audits

    You want extensive integration options (200+)

    You prefer self-service with guided resources

    Choose Secureframe if:

    You prefer strong onboarding support

    You want prebuilt frameworks and templates

    You need a structured approach to compliance

    You have a smaller or less technical team

    You value white-glove support and account managers

    Both can reduce the workload of getting certified, but Vanta offers more technical control and scalability for growing environments, while Secureframe provides simplicity and human support for smaller or less technical teams.

    Final Thoughts

    Both Vanta and Secureframe help organizations move from spreadsheets to structured compliance management. Vanta wins for its automation depth, integration ecosystem, and scalability. Secureframe wins for its white-glove onboarding and ready-to-use frameworks.

    If your team is technical and growing fast, Vanta offers more automation value. If your team prefers hands-on guidance and clear frameworks, Secureframe provides a smoother path to your first certification.

    The Best Choice for Startups Aiming to Scale Through ISO 27001

    If your goal is to get certified fast and use that certification to win enterprise clients, Smartly is the smarter starting point.

    Unlike broader GRC platforms that serve larger, process-heavy organizations, Smartly is built specifically for startups and growing tech teams that want to move quickly and stay focused on product and growth.

    Here's why:

    Speed to certification

    Smartly automates 70% of the manual prep work and helps teams achieve ISO 27001 readiness in weeks, not months. You stay focused on your roadmap while Smartly handles the compliance lift.

    All-inclusive pricing

    You pay to get certified, not for extra services along the way. Every plan covers implementation, templates, audit coordination, and certification, no hidden costs.

    Budget-friendly for early-stage teams

    Designed for startups with lean budgets, Smartly delivers enterprise-grade compliance at a fraction of the usual price, no consultants, no overhead.

    Clear path to growth

    Certification isn't just a checkbox. With Smartly, it becomes a growth enabler that helps you close enterprise deals, expand globally, and build customer trust early.

    If your focus is to prove trust fast and unlock new business, Smartly gives you the fastest and most affordable path to ISO 27001 success.

    Ready to Get Certified Faster with Smartly?

    While Vanta and Secureframe are great options, Smartly offers a focused, transparent approach built specifically for ISO 27001 certification—with faster results and expert guidance.

    });